We have a paid referral link for Mercor, not for Turing. Both are compared on the same criteria and dates, and the referral doesn't change what we show.
Compare · AI training & evaluation · updated 13 Oct 2026Mercor vs Turing
Quick take
- Mercor pays more per hour in practice: about $83/h at the middle of its realistic range, against $58/h on Turing.
- Mercor pays sooner: first money from 7 days, against 14 on Turing.
- Turing is open in more places (worldwide) than Mercor (worldwide, except Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria).
- Neither costs anything to start.
- Mercor is turbulent with grade A (official source); Turing is open with grade C (self-reported).
Side by side
| Mercor Grade A: Official source Grade A means: Official source. The grade says how well-sourced this page is, not how good Mercor is. More in the glossary Turbulent status, as of 13 Oct 2026 Checked 4 days ago | Turing Grade C: Self-reported Grade C means: Self-reported. The grade says how well-sourced this page is, not how good Turing is. More in the glossary Open status, as of 13 Oct 2026 Checked 4 days ago | |
|---|---|---|
| Realistic pay | ≈ $16–150/h Realistic hourly equivalent | ≈ $25–90/h Realistic hourly equivalent |
| Advertised | $20–250/h what the platform says | — |
| Median listed rate | $75/h aitrainer.work (P. Romeo), 12 Oct 2026 | — |
| At 10 h/week | ≈ $688–6,450/mo our estimate | ≈ $1,075–3,870/mo our estimate |
| First money | 7–60 days Days to weeks from application to first contract; first Stripe payout has a 7-day hold | 14–28 days |
| Fees | None for talent; instant payout 1% (optional) | — |
| Cost to start | $0 | $0 |
| Hours | no minimum async (some projects set weekly caps or minimums) | from 20 h/week partly_scheduled (PST overlap) |
| Where it's open | Worldwide, except Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria | Worldwide |
| Education | varies by listing; top rates need graduate degree, license or senior industry experience | varies |
| Status | Turbulent as of 13 Oct 2026 | Open as of 13 Oct 2026 |
| Grade | A · Official source 11 sourced facts | C · Self-reported 2 sourced facts |
| Checked | 13 Oct 2026 | 13 Oct 2026 |
| The catch | 2026: a reported data breach via a supply-chain attack on the LiteLLM library was followed by six proposed class actions (pending, allegations not proven). The platform collects ID documents and biometric data for verification, so the stakes of a breach are high | Profiles can sit 'assigned to client' for weeks |
Pay figures are what platforms advertise or what workers report, each with its date. They are not typical or guaranteed earnings: yours depend on your skills, hours, location and how much work is available. Each figure has its source on the entry's page.
Advertised vs. reality same scale
Mercor
- Advertised$20–250/h
- Median listed$75/haitrainer.work (P. Romeo), 12 Oct 2026
- Realistic range$16–150/h
Turing
Not enough hourly data for a bar.
Who each one suits
Mercor
Pros
- Highest expert rates in the category
- Weekly pay via Stripe/Wise
- Passed assessments are reused across similar roles
Cons
- Projects can end without notice; large offboardings were reported in 2026
- Pay can be cut on renewal (Nov 2025: $21/h -> $16/h on a rehire offer)
- Monitoring software takes random screenshots
Turing
Pros
- Larger, steadier contracts (often 20+ h/week)
- Strong fit for software engineers
- You see the rate before accepting
Cons
- Profiles can sit 'assigned to client' for weeks
- Evening work outside the Americas
- No published rates
More comparisons
Mercor vs OutlierMercor vs micro1DataAnnotation vs MercorAlignerr vs MercorHandshake AI Fellowship vs MercorEthos vs Mercor All comparisons All of AI training & evaluation